It’s not the motor that has issue with torque, it’s the DCT. Unless you upgrade the clutch packs that is why you’d need to keep torque below 800.
Stainless Works headers | 2" x 3" headers |
Lethal Performance resonator delete | H-Pipe delete |
Nitto (front 305/35R20) | NT555 G2 |
Nitto (rear, 315/35R20) | NT555 RII |
Kong 108mm Throttle Body | 108 Billet |
Injector Dynamics | ID1300x |
NKG Iridium IX | LTR7IX-11 |
Palm Beach Motorsport | Heat Exchanger |
Whipple Superchargers | 1" - 1" Intercooler |
SPE | IC Manifold - Whipple |
SPE | Thermostat |
LP Griptec | 2.5" Pulley Kit |
Gates 8 Rib HD Belt | K080670HD |
SPE | Fuel Rail Kit |
Whipple Superchargers | Belt Tensironer |
Jokerz Performance | SC porting |
Gforce Performance | FOR10115A Axles |
SPE | Vertical Links |
Kelltrac | IRS Subframe Posi-Loc |
Palm Beach Motorsport | Tuning |
It’s not the motor that has issue with torque, it’s the DCT. Unless you upgrade the clutch packs that is why you’d need to keep torque below 800.Ported will make more top end and slightly less low end but enough to make a difference in durability in the long run. Ported will give you more HP while making less torque, torque is the engine killer in high HP cars. You want to keep the torque around 800-850 with the 3.8 (lower than 800 is even better) to give the motor more durability.
Very true, I read a very good article about Our DCT transmission its very durable up to 800 to 850, above that its very important to upgrade the Clutch packs, I think a few other parts too.It’s not the motor that has issue with torque, it’s the DCT. Unless you upgrade the clutch packs that is why you’d need to keep torque below 800.
Mods are happening next month, but I won’t be pushing that much torque so DCT is staying stock.Very true, I read a very good article about Our DCT transmission its very durable up to 800 to 850, above that its very important to upgrade the Clutch packs, I think a few other parts too.
I honestly can't remember where I read it though, it was over a year ago.
Brian have you done any serious mods to your Engine/DCT? I am just curious![]()
Please post a build thread with pictures Brian, you know we love pictures hereMods are happening next month, but I won’t be pushing that much torque so DCT is staying stock.
I'm sticking with high torque on a blower car is no bueno. The ported 3.8 will give you higher HP with less torque as compared to a non ported 3.8 blower (same HP will have higher torque).It’s not the motor that has issue with torque, it’s the DCT. Unless you upgrade the clutch packs that is why you’d need to keep torque below 800.
I spoke to Ken at PBD this morning and asked a few questions. He recommended non porting of the Whipple and with ID1300 injectors and a fuel system to support it then 900+rwhp for 93 and 1100+rwhp on e85. That’s with the stock 3.825 pulley. I didn’t get a chance to ask what power it would make on say a 3.75 pulley.I'm sticking with high torque on a blower car is no bueno. The ported 3.8 will give you higher HP with less torque as compared to a non ported 3.8 blower (same HP will have higher torque).
I'm sure that Ken has talked about his 800 torque number while tuning blower GT500s. He will go higher on turbo cars.
I helped 2 people install 3.8's with over 1100HP/ and over 850 foot pounds of torque, and both were/are on stock DCT's.
The DCT will hold more than 800HP and more than 800 foot pound of torque, heck a GT500 (1300HP) with stock engine and DCT has ran 8's.
Ideally, I would not want to run high torque with the stock DCT. I will for sure upgrade mine along with axles.
But I'm no expert.
Did he give you the torque numbers for each tune?I spoke to Ken at PBD this morning and asked a few questions. He recommended non porting of the Whipple and with ID1300 injectors and a fuel system to support it then 900+rwhp for 93 and 1100+rwhp on e85. That’s with the stock 3.825 pulley. I didn’t get a chance to ask what power it would make on say a 3.75 pulley.
I forgot to asked but I sent him an email asking so hope to hear back on it.Did he give you the torque numbers for each tune?
If it were me I would go ported. It might take a couple of weeks for one to come in but it would be worth it. I almost pulled the trigger on a ported Whipple but decided to go twin turbo instead.I forgot to asked but I sent him an email asking so hope to hear back on it.
Yeah I went back and was watching his videos again. I think to hit the 1100rwhp I'm going to have to step down to a 3.25 pulley. When he went to the 3.0 pulley he made over 1260rwhp and over 860lb ft of torque but to try to keep the torq down I think the 3.25 pulley will be the one to go with.Ken's youtube video of his whipple car install STARTS on the 3.7 upper pulley & E85 he then steps down to a 3.5 upper pulley & E85.
(He doesn't start on a 3.8 upper as I did)
-He at no point shows us a 93 tune on the whipple at least with his car.. but here are those dyno figures...
-Very similar to my 3.8 whipple (I don't have cats & it was a cooler day) I made in the middle of his numbers on the 3.8 upper alone.
KENS:
3.75 upper / E85
3.5 upper / E85
NO WHERE NEAR 800rwtq which I do agree with stay under unless you're digging into the DCT
View attachment 273218
Are you doing a fuel system upgrade? Sorry if I missed that info. From what I’ve seen it would seem you could safely assume a 150-175 difference in power between 93 and E85.Yeah I went back and was watching his videos again. I think to hit the 1100rwhp I'm going to have to step down to a 3.25 pulley. When he went to the 3.0 pulley he made over 1260rwhp and over 860lb ft of torque but to try to keep the torq down I think the 3.25 pulley will be the one to go with.
I would be interested to know on the 3.25 pulley what one could make on 93.
Yes, a 3 pump return fuel style system.Are you doing a fuel system upgrade? Sorry if I missed that info. From what I’ve seen it would seem you could safely assume a 150-175 difference in power between 93 and E85.
If he ports and keeps it turned down (for now) to lets say 900-950 hp / >815 TQ, I do not see a need to build a small block.If you're going to port a Whipple, you really should be planning on installing a built short block.
Then you don't need the port, other than bragging rights.If he ports and keeps it turned down (for now) to lets say 900-950 hp / >815 TQ, I do not see a need to build a small block.
Most folks port to get to the 1300HP mark, I'm saying in this case, port and keep the tune modest for engine longevity, not to gain huge HP.
Then later when 900-950 is not enough, he builds a block.
With all of this said, the stock GT500 is damn near perfect IMO.
There's zero room for 93 octane + a 3.25 pulley, you're talking 20lbs or so of boost far surpassing the detonation limits of 93 octane. A 3.7 upper is doable on pump gas and a slight, slight possibly of a 3.6 upper pulley. I'd say the vast majority of tuners are going to shy away from anything +17lbs of boost on 93 pump gas. Engine WILL go BOOM. Pump gas 3.8 upper pulley = yes, 3.7 upper pulley = yes smaller and your crossing into dangerous waters.Yeah I went back and was watching his videos again. I think to hit the 1100rwhp I'm going to have to step down to a 3.25 pulley. When he went to the 3.0 pulley he made over 1260rwhp and over 860lb ft of torque but to try to keep the torq down I think the 3.25 pulley will be the one to go with.
I would be interested to know on the 3.25 pulley what one could make on 93.